Why I'm opposed to AI writing but not AI coding
The author argues he accepts AI-generated code because customers and managers care only that software works, looks good, and is fast and reliable, provided a human engineer writes the specs and enforces the tests, whereas he opposes AI writing because "writing is thinking" and outsourcing it produces slop that doesn't contain the author's thoughts. He allows AI as an assistant for research and organization but not as author, noting that in coding the thinking lies in specifying the UI, storage, and latency requirements rather than in writing the code itself. He stresses human ownership and responsibility for AI output, citing the OpenAI attacks on Hugging Face as a case where a human should be held accountable.