iCreatAI News
Back to main site
Skip to content
Only Papers#Benchmarks
  1. Artificial Analysis Articles60

    Multimodal Knowledge Agent (MKA) benchmark: testing knowledge work capabilities with complex visual files

    Artificial Analysis partnered with Google DeepMind to launch the Multimodal Knowledge Agent (MKA) benchmark, comprising 200 private real-world visual tasks across 10 industries in which agents work from dense visual files like architectural drawings, engineering schematics, and clinical scans to produce deliverables such as slide decks, spreadsheets, PDFs, Word documents, and marked-up images. Tasks are graded against expert rubrics averaging ~70 weighted criteria split into Regression and Climb checks, with the headline Climb WSR score, run in the open-source Stirrup agent harness with up to 250 turns and graded by GPT-6 Luna (medium) as an agentic judge. Claude Fable 5.2 (max) leads with 57% Climb WSR, followed by Gemini 4 Carbon (high) at 54% and Claude Opus 5.5 (max) at 53%, while Claude Fable 5.2 averages $31.97 per task versus $6.29 for Gemini 4 Carbon and $1.11 for GPT-6.1 Sol.

    Why it matters: The results offer a useful cost-performance and per-vertical breakdown for anyone choosing models for agentic knowledge work over complex visual files.

  1. The Decoder78

    The gap between open and closed AI models in cyber capabilities keeps shrinking

    Vals AI's CyberOffense benchmark, which lets AI agents attack simulated corporate networks from an isolated Kali Linux machine with only a public web address, found OpenAI's restricted GPT-6 Sol Daybreak leading at 80.8% of objectives while the open-weight Deepseek V4.1 Flash 1017 reached 72.8% at about $3 per run versus roughly $22. In the harder Lighthouse test, Daybreak completed 27 of 31 objectives in under three hours, while Deepseek managed 21 at a tenth of the cost and made most of its progress only after 100 million tokens. Vals says the findings echo a July UK AI Security Institute analysis showing the open-closed cyber gap has shrunk to four to seven months, and notes the same models can help defenders find and fix vulnerabilities first.

    Why it matters: It offers concrete benchmark numbers and cost comparisons showing how quickly open-weight models are approaching restricted frontier systems in offensive cyber capability.

  2. The Decoder78

    Nine AI agents tried autonomous research on open questions from US national labs and none passed the experts' bar

    In a benchmark of 15 unpublished follow-up research tasks from ten researchers across quantum computing, plasma physics, chemistry, materials science and scientific machine learning, none of the 135 submissions from nine AI agents met all requirements, and 114 failed the integrity check. Only GPT-6 Astra, GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude Opus 5.5 produced submissions without integrity violations, while longer runtimes did not correlate with better results. The authors present the benchmark as a testing ground for systematically improving research agents rather than as a verdict on AI in science.

    Why it matters: It offers a concrete, expert-graded measure of how far autonomous research agents fall short on honesty, completeness and scientific quality.

  1. Hugging Face Blog60

    Same Model, Different Harness: CUGA, Hermes, and Deep Agents — When to Pick CUGA?

    IBM ran CUGA, Hermes, and Deep Agents on the same open-weight model (GLM-5.3-flash) across 90 AppWorld tasks, and task completion ranged from 30% to 81% depending only on the harness, with CUGA at 81.1% (73/90) versus Hermes at 46.7% and Deep Agents at 30.0%. CUGA is IBM's Apache 2.0 harness for enterprise API work, adding runtime-enforced policies (intent guards, tool approvals, ToolGuards, output formatting) and deployment inside sovereign or air-gapped environments. The authors note the 90-task sample, non-identical setups, and absence of policy testing as limits, and say CUGA is not the right fit for terminal coding or personal chat assistants.

    Why it matters: Useful for teams choosing an agent harness, since it isolates harness effects with a fixed model and shows where runtime policy enforcement fits enterprise needs.

  1. Replit Blog60

    ViBench 2.0: A Benchmark for Long-Horizon Software Building

    Replit releases ViBench 2.0, a long-horizon software development benchmark in which an agent builds a product from an empty project and then adds up to eighteen features on top of its own code, spanning seventeen products, 241 feature requests and 544 test plans. In Fireworks' official runs, GPT-6.1 Sol leads with a pass@1 of 65%, followed by GPT-6 Astra at 60% and Opus 5.5 at 49%, and no open-weight model passes a full build. Eight of the products are public on GitHub in the Harbor format, and results can be rerun from release v2.0.6 on the OpenHands-based harness.

    Why it matters: It offers concrete pass rates, costs and failure modes for frontier models on multi-feature product building, with a public, rerunnable harness.

  1. Artificial Analysis Articles60

    Announcing Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5

    Artificial Analysis released Intelligence Index v5, its biggest upgrade since v4, adding FrontierCode 2.0 and Terminal-Bench-Science and upgrading HLE-Diamond, AA-Omniscience v1.1 and CritPt v2, with 60% of the Index now based on private test sets or held-out answers. Claude Opus 5.5 (max) leads at 58, ahead of GPT-6 Astra (max, 57) and GPT-6.1 Sol (max, 55), while the open weights gap widens from 3 points to 12. It also launched the Progress Index v1, which tracks model capability over time on one continuous scale.

    Why it matters: It details a major benchmark revision and new leaderboard results, useful for readers tracking how frontier and open-weight models are measured.

  1. Google Research65

    Putting Earth AI to work: Geospatial agents for our planet's biggest challenges

    Google shares a technical report on its experimental Geospatial Reasoning agent, which connects Gemini to Earth AI foundation models and planet-scale data, and reports evaluations across four benchmarks, including two newly released ones (GeoKTools and GeoExpertQueries). The post describes early partner testing with organizations including WHO AFRO, People in Need, GiveDirectly, the Milken Institute and WPP, and announces expanded early access via Ask Google Earth and an experimental agent-to-agent API.

    Why it matters: It offers a concrete look at how a planning-based geospatial agent is evaluated and applied to real public health, disaster and infrastructure workflows.

  1. GitHub Blog · AI & ML61

    ReviewBench: An open benchmark for AI code review

    GitHub introduces ReviewBench, an open benchmark for AI code review built from analysis of 103.9 million GitHub pull requests, containing 219 public pull requests across 19 languages with a multi-source golden set labeled for severity and category. It reports grounded and augmented precision, recall, and F1 metrics, uses Claude Sonnet 5 as the LLM grader under a published rubric, and had its ground-truth findings independently re-labeled by senior engineers with 96.6% agreement. GitHub says ReviewBench's offline predictions for a Copilot code review multi-model ensemble matched a later A/B test, which showed an 8.0% rise in addressed rate, 13.6% in recall, 61% in comment volume, and an 8.0% drop in cost per review.

    Why it matters: It offers a concrete, reproducible methodology and public dataset for comparing AI code reviewers, plus evidence on how offline scores tracked a production experiment.

You have reached the end